Pages

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Squid Flicks: A Hard Day's Night

Title: A Hard Day's Night
Director: Richard Lester
Original Release: July 6, 1964
My Overall Rating: 4 stars out of 5

via Wikipedia

Especially as I get older, I try to take closer notice of the things that bring me joy.  Time with family and good friends?  Check.  Science fiction?  Check, and especially Trek these days, obviously.  Sports?  I do obsess over baseball - yes, even in the off season.  Music?  That almost goes without saying.  And I can't deny, nearly 40 years after I first fell in love with them, that it's still The Fab Four above all others.  The Beatles are and have always been the very embodiment of joy - for me and for literally millions of other people over multiple generations.

So, you don't think the Beatles are the greatest band ever?  Okay.  Let's play a game.  You pick your challenger, any popular music act in history.  (I willingly concede that classical and jazz are higher leagues.)  Not only that, but you get to decide on the best eight years of that act's run.  Ready?

What are the 10 best songs from your act's 8 best years.  I would offer The Beatles' 10 best.  For demonstration purposes, my personal favorites off the top of my head...
  • Here, There and Everywhere
  • In My Life
  • Tomorrow Never Knows
  • Help!
  • Something
  • While My Guitar Gently Weeps
  • Yesterday
  • Let It Be
  • Here Comes the Sun
  • I Am the Walrus
At this point, your group might look pretty good.  Numerous acts could put together a solid 10 from their peak years.  

How about the best 20?  Harder now, isn't it?    Bear in mind, for my boys, this couldn't even yet cover all of the Billboard #1s, and those aren't even necessarily The Beatles' best songs.  In fact, they're not.  Still like your list better?  Fine.

(I'll happily keep listing songs for anyone who will take me up on this challenge.)

Best 50.  You're scraping now or at least you will be soon.  For me, we haven't even gotten to proper hidden gems territory yet.

Best 100.  Wait, 100?!!!  Most other bands don't even have 100 songs over 8 years!  Fine.  Of course, you're making my argument for me.  I'll give you another 8 years if you want.  Hell, I'll give you your band's full run if that's what it takes to dredge up 100 decent songs.  I'm still winning.

But what about those covers?  "Twist and Shout" doesn't count!  Fine, but then they don't for your band either.  In fact, if anyone other than a band member even has a writing credit, that song is out.  See ya, Elton John.  Elvis has definitely left the building.

Best 200.  You see my point, I hope.  The longer the list gets, the more ridiculous comparisons become.  The second tier, third tier, fourth tier Beatles songs are more often than not genuinely masterful.  Even the best bands had to pad their albums with fluff.  The Beatles' fluff is still dazzling.  And the first tier is massive.

The final tally for The Beatles was 213 songs released between October 1962 and May 1970.  Folks, they did it all in eight years.  There is no comparison with anyone else.

For the record, if you picked Stevie Wonder, I'd be nervous.  I'd still win but I'd be nervous.

Still not convinced?  I could offer the Third Best Beatle argument.  George Harrison had a better, more interesting and more influential career than the third best member of your band, no contest.  Was he helped by the fact he was a Beatle?  Of course.  So were John and Paul, I assure you.  And your guy had advantages by association, too.  George still made more of his opportunities.

Or the Liverpool argument.  If you're neither British nor a football (soccer) fan, the most likely reason you've even heard of Liverpool, a city of half a million people, is The Beatles.  The band and its history are vital elements of Liverpool's tourist industry.  Few other musicians can stake that sort of claim to a major city.  Maybe Mozart in Salzburg or Elvis in Memphis.  End of list.

100 years from now, new generations will still be discovering The Beatles.  The joy will endure, perhaps even grow.  There will still be kids falling in love with them as I did.  Like me, once they get past the big hits, they'll experience the same delight in finding songs like "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away" or "For No One" or "The Inner Light."  I didn't even properly appreciate that last one myself until, I don't know, my late 40s.  Never made it onto an album - not even in the US where practically all of them made it onto LPs.  Was only ever a B-side to "Lady Madonna."  Yet it's possibly the best of George's India songs.  And a Star Trek episode is named for it - one of the best Star Trek episodes!

Your band does not have a song like "The Inner Light."

No joke, I could go on like this for pages and pages.  Perhaps I will someday.  For now, I should get back to the movie...


I had the house to myself this past weekend - just me and the cats.  I am about as introverted as a person can be so, as much as I love my family, time to myself is vital to my well-being.  What better way to make the most of it than with Beatles movies?

In 1964, it was all just beginning.  A Hard Day's Night is technically a mockumentary but the constantly being mobbed in public was real.  And so was the personal charm.  The Beatles were definitely not professional actors.  They were just walking about being themselves.  The playfulness you see on screen was effortless.  John's comic timing in the "You look just like him" scene is impeccable.  He said himself, everyone in Liverpool's a comedian.  Seeing that in action is magical.


A Hard Day's Night
is no fluff piece, either.  Sure, it was thrown together quickly to capitalize on the mania but Lester took the job seriously.  Numerous filmmakers claim it as an inspiration.

And, of course, the most enduring stars are the songs themselves...
  • Two singles went to #1: "Can't Buy Me Love," one of the best-selling 45s of the 1960s, and "A Hard Day's Night," my choice as the very best of their pre-1965 catalog.  
  • "I Should Have Known Better" would probably have been a #1 if it hadn't been a B-side.  Oh, the list of Beatles B-sides...  That would trounce your band's list soundly.
  • The lovely "If I Fell" was one of Lennon/McCartney's "early attempts at a ballad," in John's words.  They figured out that particular trick quickly.  The following year, they'd crank out "Yesterday" and "In My Life" among other timeless masterpieces.
  • Leading the charge for the previously released material is "She Loves You," so easily dismissed upon first listening as a dippy bubblegum hit and boy did it sell.  In the UK, it's the band's all-time #1.  The more you listen, the more you appreciate the musical genius behind the goofy lyrics.
  • Naturally, the soundtrack album topped the charts, too.
Through it all, joy - pure, unadulterated joy.  

Thank you for reading.

15 comments:

  1. My son is in my phone with (he’s very clean) after his name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I’m guessing you know the layers of the joke itself…

      Delete
    2. I mean, I know some. I know it was a joke the four of them actually used to make with each other.

      If there's more, please share.

      Delete
  2. I am not well versed in Stevie Wonder’s catalog but if Paul had released his first two solo albums as Wings records, that bands output would be interesting to add to the conversation.

    Alas……

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stevie Wonder is the one artist I could think of who could possibly match the sheer volume and the consistent quality over a short period of time. I have no problem conceding his Music of My Mind to Songs in the Key of Life stretch is the best five-album run anyone has ever had, Beatles included. And boy, did Motown make people work. So, Stevie Wonder 1968-76 could probably hang in with The Beatles comparison for longer than most.

      But the other typical contenders... Led Zeppelin wins the virtuosity argument, no contest, at least against The Beatles. I still say the funk bands have a strong case. But the catalog? Only 94 Zeppelin songs over 12 years. And plenty of... ahem... borrowed material.

      The Stones catalog is immense: over 400 songs but over several decades. And they themselves have admitted there was no competing with The Beatles.

      Lennon/McCartney was a machine. Honestly, as songwriters, I think you have to go back to Tin Pan Alley for meaningful comparisons and even the Porters and Berlins couldn't match the astonishing range of material.

      Wings... I'm not quite sure what you mean. I have wondered at what point one could reasonably include the solo (or Wings or Plastic Ono or Traveling Wilburys) material in my little game. Maybe if someone insists on extending the timeline? But that undermines my point.

      I realize your feelings are different. For me, very few of the post-Beatles songs from any of the four members would rank comfortably with the best from 1962-70. But boy, would they strengthen the bench, especially those first five years when all three of the primary songwriters were still producing at an astonishing rate with high quality. I have grown particularly fond of All Things Must Pass in recent years. But that's all a discussion for another time.

      Delete
    2. As the saying goes…”Wings... the band The Beatles could have been.”

      Delete
    3. (He's trying to wind you up. Don't rise to the bait. Don't rise to the bait. Don't)

      You know perfectly well even McCartney would never say that!

      Out loud.

      In public.

      Delete
  3. The Beatles are supreme. I love ABBA but the Beatles win out. That is logical.i love that odd film especially when Ringo leaves for a bit and ends up at the Thames

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha! Yup. He'd been out all night and came in still drunk. Lester decided it was the best way to make use of an otherwise unfortunate situation. Ah, the magic of cinema...

      And please know, Birgit, I would never suggest subjective preferences don't matter. I realize there are people who just flat out don't like The Beatles or prefer others. That's one of so many reasons why music is awesome: something for everyone. The above is one of those bar stool arguments I have in my head. That's the great thing about a blog: you can answer the questions no one in your daily life every asks you but you wish they would.

      As for ABBA, I can't say I knew them growing up but I certainly enjoyed their resurgence in the '90s, inspired by a couple of Australian films, oddly enough.

      Delete
  4. The Beatles are the best band ever!!! I don't need convincing. I hope dementia never robs me of the memory of watching them the first time they were on The Ed Sullivan Show. My older sisters and I were thrilled and screaming. On July 4th, 1989, I saw Paul at RFK Stadium. Best night of my life. I had tickets to see Ringo last summer and got sick and couldn't go. I was very disappointed and hope I get another chance with him. I would also love to see Paul again. I'd clean out my savings account for tickets.

    Love,
    Janie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have never seen either live. One of my students saw Paul in Montreal on the most recent tour. I was crazy jealous.

      Delete
  5. I see your fervent defense of The Beatles, and raise you "The Shitty Beatles"--They Might Be Giants.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Solid choice! I love TMBG. I've even posted about them. See here: https://armchairsquid.blogspot.com/2018/10/a-window-above-birdhouse-in-your-soul.html

      I will acknowledge, they are a worthy challenger. They can't match The Beatles' commercial success. Few are in that league. But as prolific producers maintaining consistent quality, they have a strong case.

      I'm up for this one. First, what would you say is their best eight-year stretch? For strength of material, I'd think you'd want Flood as your anchor. So maybe 1988-96? On the other hand, there are more prolific periods, especially if you count the children's albums and you should. 2013-2021?

      Here I am trying to play both sides. Whaddaya say, NyQuilDriver? Best 8 years, then the best 10 songs from those years?

      Filibuster vigilantly!

      Delete
    2. Honestly, choosing the best 8-year stretch is pretty difficult already...I was introduced to TMBG through their children's music, then listened to the rest of their work in high school, and then again after seeing Them live a few years ago.

      While I am very partial to their first album, I think 1988-1996 is a strong contender for their best 8 year stretch...but then that counts out the 13 albums they've made since 2001. 2013-2021 is also a good suggestion, but that leaves out a good chunk of the early 00s which I think has some of their best songs. The problem with a band like this is you end up with choice paralysis, although maybe that indicates more about me than Them.

      For the sake of argument I'll go with 1988-1996, with the following ten songs:
      1. Ana Ng
      2. Snowball in Hell
      3. Birdhouse in Your Soul
      4. Twisting
      5. Narrow Your Eyes
      6. A Self Called Nowhere
      7. Out of Jail
      8. The End of the Tour
      9. How Can I Sing Like a Girl?
      10. Pet Name
      While Flood is universally beloved for obvious reasons, I personally have a soft spot for John Henry and Factory Showroom. Plus that makes this matchup a little more even: four bowlcuttéd men versus two men plus the rhythm section. Unless a drum machine counts as two people.

      Also--because I can't help myself--here's a bonus 2013-2021 list:
      1. Call You Mom
      2. Black Ops
      3. Erase
      4. Music Jail, Pt. 1 & 2
      5. I Love You for Psychological Reasons
      6. By The Time You Get This
      7. Mrs. Bluebeard
      8. Brontosaurus
      9. Moonbeam Rays
      10. Super Cool

      Fingers crossed that their long-awaited 24th album comes out sometime soon...and thank you for being game for this!

      Delete