Pages

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Star Trek: Patterns of Force

Episode: "Patterns of Force"
Series: Star Trek: The Original Series
Season 2, Episode 21
Original Air Date: February 16, 1968
via Wikipedia
The Enterprise travels to planet Ekos in search of the missing John Gill, a Federation observer and a favorite professor of Kirk's at the Academy.  All is not well.  The Ekosians have adopted Nazi Germany as their cultural model with Gill as their figurehead.  Our hereoes, joined by the oppressed Zeonians (Zionists) infiltrate the ranks to get to Gill and topple the regime.  The image of two Jewish actors (Shatner and Nimoy) in Nazi garb is a poignant one.  As Star Trek costume dramas go, I thought this one worked better than "A Piece of the Action" (reflection here).

"Patterns of Force" was banned on German television for nearly 30 years due to the imagery and the expressed claim that the Nazis were the most efficient government ever devised.  That was actually a commonly held historical view in 1960s USA.  That assertion has since been debunked in academic circles, citing the large, incompetent, ill-defined bureaucracies that governed the regime.

*****
via Wikipedia
David Brian (Gill) was born on August 5, 1914 in New York City.  A trained dancer, he worked as a doorman before joining the vaudeville circuit.  No less than Joan Crawford convinced him to give film acting a try. 

Television guest appearances kept him busy through the '50s and '60s.  His most prominent big screen role was as the defense attorney in 1949's Intruder in the Dust.  That performance earned him a Golden Globe nomination.

Brian died of heart disease and cancer in 1993.  He'd been married to Lorna Gray, his second wife, since 1949.

18 comments:

  1. I didn't know that was a common '60s belief. Which would make "Patterns of Force" an explanation as to how stupid that belief was. As if it were necessary...!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently so. They didn't believe that the Nazis were morally good so much as effective. You know, how people talk about Mussolini getting the trains to run on time. And yeah, it's really stupid.

      Delete
  2. This episode sounds familiar and thank you for refreshing my memory.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 'citing the large, incompetent, ill-defined bureaucracies that governed'

    Um. Sounds familiar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think anyone's ever accused the American government of being efficient. It's still better than most of the alternatives but expedience is not its strong suit.

      I think that was the broader thinking in the '60s and I remember hearing this in terms of the Soviet Union, too: totalitarian regimes are inherently more efficient than democratic ones because the decision-making process is faster. But the individual liberties of a less-restrictive system bring advantages that far outweigh the loss of efficiency. All the Poli Sci types of the era were still saying "our way" was better, just not without disadvantages. This story takes the idea to the extreme.

      Delete
  4. Like the idea that everything mechanical they did was superior.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dangling modifier... not exactly sure which assertion you're attaching this to but... I'll go with the assertion that Nazi government was more efficient and the fact that their mechanical superiority has also been debunked.

      I think the philosophy here follows along the same lines as my response to Suze above. Both Japan and Germany (and for that matter, Russia/USSR) were able to catch up with the rest of the industrialized world by building very quickly, including beefing up their military capacity. But long term, building fast didn't necessarily mean building well and all three powers bled the national coffers bone dry in order to make it happen.

      The German and Japanese economies since the War make for an interesting study: slower, more thoughtful, building from the ground up, responsive to the needs of the consumer. One could argue the Allies did both a huge favor by limiting what resources they could devote to the military.

      Delete
  5. Yeah, that, basically.
    I read this series a while back by Turtledove which is an alternate history of WWII (where aliens invade), and the books go on and on about how well built everything German is. It got annoying.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In the '60s I considered this episode a cautionary tale, one that succeeded in defining kakistocracy --government by a nation's worst elements-- but never shook the feeling the actors just made the thing up as they went along.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kakistocracy is a new word for me. Thank you, sir!

      Delete
  7. Considering the news, world events and social upheaval of this same time period, you have to smile when you consider that THIS episode (of all things) was banned. Keep the Berlin Wall...put tape on Spock and Kirk.

    Great post, Officer Von Squidheim.

    Cherdo
    www.cherdoontheflipside.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well... It was the East Germans who built the wall. Neither side was too keen to have its citizenry remember the Nazis with fondness.

      Delete
  8. When I watched episodes of Star Trek when I was growing up I didn't quite realize how the writers were helping to spotlight things about society/cultures. Now as an adult I am often intrigued to see the way the plots were designed to make you think and to show when as humans we were being stupid. :)

    Thanks for refreshing my memory on this episode- it isn't one I remember seeing.
    ~Jess

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, I had no clue of this back when I first encountered the show in the '70s. But my main questions during my current explorations pertain to the long lasting appeal of the franchises, far beyond the more successful TV shows of its era. I think the philosophical underpinnings have a lot to do with it.

      Delete
  9. I remember this one watching this one but don't remember too much. And sure didn't get the deeper meaning.

    cheers, parsnip

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd certainly never seen it before, but then that's true for most of these.

      Delete