Rudyard Kipling's classic,
The Jungle Book, is the tale of Mowgli, a human child raised by a pack of wolves. Now that he is growing up, he must go back to the man village before Shere Khan the tiger catches up to him. It is, of course, all a metaphor for growing up, leaving home and finding one's place in the world. Over the past two weekends, we have watched both the 1967 and 2016 Disney interpretations of Kipling's story.
Title:
The Jungle Book
Director: Wolfgang Reitherman
Original Release: 1967
My Overall Rating: 4 stars out of 5
There is still something elegant and charming in Disney's cel animated films. The main selling point for me with
Jungle Book, though, has always been the music. I was, in fact, first introduced to the story through the soundtrack album. The Sherman brothers of
Mary Poppins fame supplied most of the songs, including "That's What Friends Are For" as performed by Liverpudlian vultures and "I Wan'na Be Like You" as performed by King Louis, the orangutan monarch. Louis is voiced by none other than Louis Prima in one of the all-time genius casting moves.
Interestingly, the Shermans did not write the movie's most famous song. "The Bare Necessities" was written by Terry Gilkyson. The song has been covered by numerous artists in the years since.
Title:
The Jungle Book
Director: Jon Favreau
Original Release: 2016
My Overall Rating: 4 stars out of 5
Favreau's movie is visually stunning. Needless to say, the technological capabilities of animation have increased exponentially in 49 years. The new telling is also much darker. For what is often a sad and scary story, the 1967 version maintains a remarkably lighthearted feel. Threats loom around every corner in Favreau's film. The voice cast is excellent: Ben Kingsley, Bill Murray, Idris Elba, Scarlett Johansson and Christopher Walken all shine.
A few of the songs carry over, though they lose some of their impact in the darker tale. And as amusing as it is to hear Walken sing, he's no Prima.
The two movies end very differently. To say more would be to spoil and I won't but there's no denying that the difference changes the meaning of the story significantly. Another discussion for another day.