Author: J.K. Rowling
via Amazon |
The original book was a tough act to follow and overall, I would say the second book isn't quite as good. That said, it's still amazing. I admire Rowling's efforts to break away from her own formula quickly. For instance, Harry isn't trapped with the Dursleys all summer, actually getting to spend the last month at the Weasley's charming home. Getting physically to Diagon Alley or even Hogwarts wasn't quite as simple as it was the year before. We see more tension in the adult wizard community, particularly between the Weasley and Malfoy families.
Strong world-building elements:
- There are both cookbooks and comic books targeted to the magical community in the Weasley home.
- We learn of Ron's favorite club quidditch team: the Chudley Cannons.
- A quidditch question: are substitutions allowed? There are only seven players on the Gryffindor house team and only seven allowed on the pitch at a time. That seems short-sighted.
Chamber of Secrets is also the first important Ginny Weasley story. Spoiler: Ginny's my favorite character in the series, followed by Neville Longbottom and, of course, Snape... More on that in future books.
Sounds interesting, but I was never a fan of Potter! Have a lovely day☺
ReplyDeleteYou, too.
DeleteI loved HP from the minute I started reading the first book. I agree that book 2 wasn't quite as good as book 1- but it was still awesome and made me want to read book 3 (which I loved). Loved the review!
ReplyDelete~Jess
I'm working on 3 now so obviously I'll have more to say soon. For now... I feel like #3 is the one that sets the stage for the rest of the series, kind of like The Empire Strikes Back for Star Wars.
DeleteI so loved this whole series. I have a fondness for the Weasley twins.
ReplyDelete:)
DeleteFred and George are my wife's favorites.
I don't remember how I felt about this one in comparison to the first one. I think I thought it was better?
ReplyDeleteThree and Five are my favorites, though.
I guess my feeling about #2 is that it seems like more of the same. #3, on the other hand, opens up whole new angles for the broader story.
DeleteI think it was more of the same, just a little deeper. It's still setting the stage.
DeleteYes. And it's still really good. Were I to graph it, #2 would represent a very slight dip for me, then the next point would be way up the Y-axis.
Delete