1. This film is one of a very popular series. The original book series essentially saved the print media industry. No, I'm not exaggerating.
2. It is the first film in the series to address the pain of romantic love. Not mere jealousy. Pain.
3. One of the actors in the film passed away early this year. Universally revered as a supremely talented performer, he had impressive stage credentials in addition to his varied screen roles. In this movie, in particular, I was struck by how beautifully he moves.
Drum roll please...
Title: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Director: David Yates
Original Release: 2009
My Overall Rating: 5 stars out of 5
via Wikipedia |
To encourage this endeavor and to share in her experience, we have watched each of the movies as she finished each book. Before this summer, my wife and I had only ever watched the first five films so the last three were new to us, too. Generally speaking, I feel the first five movies decrease in quality as they go but the series finishes very strong, indeed, beginning with #6: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. All credit goes to director David Yates.
I've loved Harry Potter from the first book. My wife and I read it aloud to each other in our apartment in New York, trading off chapters. While it doesn't quite match The Lord of the Rings or other classic series for florid language or sophisticated world building, the Harry Potter series brings a fresh angle to the genre. We get a ringside seat as the principals go through the all-too-real transformations of adolescence. The stories' progressive darkness matches an increasing maturity and sense of responsibility for Harry. By the time we get to book #7, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, we have grown to love Harry and his friends in a way we are not always afforded with other characters in other stories. We have watched them grow. We have seen their joys, their pains, their insecurities. We know, for instance, that as brilliant a wizard as Harry is, he's a terrible date and he was, at times, quite an obnoxious teenager. We also have grown to love Hogwarts, a place where we know our dear friends have felt safe. We mourn as they do when it comes under threat. Deathly Hallows is actually the most traditional fantasy adventure of the series: a team of adventurers on a quest, desperate to fight off the forces of evil. And yet it's so different from other such adventures. It is shrouded in a deep sadness that wouldn't be there if not for everything that has come before.
So, why is The Half-Blood Prince my favorite of the bunch? From a film making standpoint, it's beautifully shot, the only one in the series to be Oscar-nominated for Best Cinematography - tip of the hat to Bruno Delbonnel. I especially enjoy the scene in the Horcrux Cave. But more importantly, Year 6 represents a vital moment in the story, the point when all that has seemed secure in Harry's world is threatened: his unquestioning reverence for his dead parents, his friendships with Ron and Hermione, his faith in Dumbledore and the impregnable fortress that is Hogwarts. By the end of The Half-Blood Prince, the stakes have been raised significantly. Our young heroes aren't kids anymore. We can only hope they're adult enough to meet their new challenges.
In the scene that stays with me, Harry finds Hermione sobbing at the bottom of a staircase. I've been to parties where I found a girl crying on the stairs. I've comforted enough friends to know the difference between one who is upset by a minor setback and one who is overwhelmed by a deeper pain. It's the difference between crying and sobbing. Crying is a momentary fit. Sobbing is a full-body convulsion. Hermione is sobbing.
Ron is the reason why she sobs. It's not just that he's with Lavender, another girl. It's his failure to recognize how much Hermione loves him. It's not a crush. It's love. We, as readers and viewers, know that Ron is simply too stupid to realize he loves her, too. But Hermione doesn't know that, not yet. All she knows is the pain. It's a human ache that has nothing to do with witchcraft or wizardry.
The actor referenced in my third clue is, of course, Alan Rickman who plays the part of Severus Snape. The Snape story is the hidden gem of the franchise. If the film series has a failing, it is the fact that not enough material is devoted to the Snape story, so rich in the books. Rickman, nonetheless, is predictably brilliant in the role. I was struck by his movement in this particular movie, odd since for the most part, he doesn't seem to move much at all. Sometimes, less is more. There's a moment when he encounters Harry on a staircase, we see him only from the back and in silhouette. Even without the scenes before it, one would know it was him. Snape moves like a dancer, all the work done in the legs (which we can't see, because of the robe), the upper body essentially still. Astaire would be proud. Even the face barely moves. Except when it does. Then it's riveting. Don't even get me started on the voice. Rickman died on January 14th of this year, pancreatic cancer. It was a huge loss for the art form.
I'm so glad there's a new book out, otherwise our Harry Potter summer would already be over. I'll be sad to leave this world, just as I was after I finished reading Deathly Hallows myself. I hope The Cursed Child is just the first of more books to come.
Next meeting is Friday, September 9th. I'll post September's blog list tomorrow. For September, pick another society member's choice from our ever increasing library to review. Today, please visit my fellow cinephiles, listed below:
It's amazing how many DVDs I discovered at home with films including Alan Rickman after he passed away. It seems like he should still be here.
ReplyDeleteI never read any of Harry Potter either, though I was interested. I saw the first three movies and my husband read the first three books. We've decided to forgo trying to read the series right now, but are looking to watch it from begining to end fairly soon. Knowing that it has so much depth, now, has be a bit more excited about it.
I certainly enjoy the franchise. There are some strong hooks in book 3. If that one stalled you... well, I'd say keep going but maybe you wouldn't care for more. I will say this: don't judge the books by the movies. I feel they are faithful adaptations but the books are still better.
DeleteI have read the first 5 books but have yet to open the 6th much to my best friend's dismay. they are brilliant but the 5th book was an ordeal even though it was great. Love the films and they are very sad in places especially as they age. I would love it if one could learn more about Snape but no one can play him like the great Alan Rickman
ReplyDeleteOne can learn more about Snape... in book 6! The movies don't give you as much.
DeleteMy favorite books are 3 and 5. 6 and 7 are my least favorite and the only two I've read only once. The issue I have with 6 is probably caused by the inclusion of Snape's backstory. The way she did it causes problems with the plot that I find more than annoying.
ReplyDeleteWell, I guess I'm just going to have to let you be annoyed. I love the Snape story. If there's a knock against the series for me, it's the fact that there aren't a lot of surprises among the principal characters. (Not counting the string of Defense Against the Dark Arts professors, of course.) Snape is the exception. Well, and Neville, if he can be considered a principal character. But that's a different sort of surprise, albeit a good one.
DeleteIt's not the Snape story that's the problem -- it's good and should have been included -- it's the way she weaved it in. It causes the main story to be unappealing to me in book 6. Or, I suppose, the correct way to say it is "boring."
DeleteInterestingly, I wouldn't say #6 is my favorite among the books. I'd pick #3. But among the movies, this is my choice. I didn't care for the Horcrux Cave in the book but in the film, I love the color filters - so effective.
DeletePrisoner of Azkaban is my favorite book, while Goblet of Fire is my favorite film. In their own ways, they encapsulate the best of the series, in either medium. The later films took on a much darker feel, which I don't have a problem with, but they're harder to single out for that reason. There's just so much to love in Goblet.
ReplyDeleteWith the books, it's relatively easy to see the now eight books as a single story. With the films, the different directors made for significant differences in the atmosphere of each story.
DeleteI read the first two books, but I believe I have most of the series. I haven't watched the movies yet.
ReplyDeleteI'm surprised by how many have said they haven't read all of them. I guess I assumed incorrectly that most in my immediate circle would have. You should definitely read the rest, Medeia!
Delete