Friday, March 28, 2014

The Cephalopod Coffeehouse: March 2014

Welcome one and all to the Cephalopod Coffeehouse, a cozy gathering of book lovers, meeting to discuss their thoughts regarding the tomes they enjoyed most over the previous month.  Pull up a chair, order your cappuccino and join in the fun.  If you wish to add your own review to the conversation, please sign on to the link list at the end of my post.

Also, next month will be the twelfth for the Coffeehouse, a full year of book loving under our belts.  It's a good time for reflection.  I'm quite happy about the way things have gone but I welcome thoughts on how I might improve upon the concept.  So please give forth in the comments section below.  Growth and evolution are good things.

Title: A Champion's Mind: Lessons from a Life in Tennis
Author: Pete Sampras with Peter Bodo
via Goodreads
It has been my month for reading tennis autobiographies.  I also read Rafael Nadal's book (review here).   As tennis players, Sampras and Nadal missed each other entirely, never having played a match against one another.  But they are currently locked in an historic battle of legacies.  With his next Grand Slam singles title - and he is always the prohibitive favorite at the French Open - Nadal will match Sampras's career total of 14.  Given the fact that Nadal has a Career Slam (all four Major titles) and Sampras doesn't, that would almost surely relegate Pete to 3rd place in most Greatest of All Time discussions.  Both men are still looking up at Roger Federer with his 17 total Slams.

Even viewing from the tail end of the glorious era of Federer-Nadal dominance, Pete Sampras is still my favorite tennis player of all.  The story of his career is very much the story of how I became a fan of the sport - the subject of one of my very earliest blog posts (read it here).  As such, reading Pete's own reflections on his career highlights affords me a quick stroll through the memories of my own young adulthood.

Sampras's insights into the sport are wonderful - in-depth analyses of the games of his rivals, descriptions of the character of each Major tournament, technical rundowns of important matches, etc.  The tone is quiet and conversational, befitting the author.  Of all the famous people I've observed in my life, Pete Sampras was the one who seemed least comfortable with being famous.  Many considered it off-putting, more accustomed to larger-than-life types like John McEnroe.  I found it endearing and one feels all the more privileged to be allowed into his confidence.

Pete is very gracious in discussing his rivals, particularly Andre Agassi.  One could argue that as undisputed top dog of his era, Pete can afford to be magnanimous but it contrasts sharply with Agassi's own book, Open (review here).  Andre is quite petty in some of his stories about Sampras and Pete got off easy compared to others.  Pete probably cast the book aside with a laugh and got on with his day.  Meanwhile, Michael Chang and Jimmy Connors were likely on the phone with their publicists.  Of course, one might say the snarkiness is part of what makes Agassi's book a fun read but it did little to endear me to him as a person.

Always a fun topic, the Greatest of All Time debate is likely to ramp up again in the coming months.  Long retired, Sampras can only watch as Nadal and Federer improve their credentials.  There are, however, two career metrics Sampras should be able to claim over both of them when all is said and done.  First, the record of which Sampras claims to be most proud is the fact that he finished World #1 for six consecutive years.  Federer topped out at four in a row.  Nadal has finished #1 three times, but never twice in succession.  Secondly, Sampras's first Major title and his last were 12 years apart.  Nadal has a shot at that since he won his first at 19 (same as Pete) but it's less likely for Roger who won his first at 21.

Reading this book soon after Nadal's allowed for interesting comparisons between the two men - so different in their public personas and styles of play, yet similarly accomplished as tennis players.  Both have a healthy, though certainly not misplaced arrogance born of success.  Yet both know that at the end of the day, they're just tennis players and their impressive resumes do not make them superior people.  The most interesting contrast to me was their opposite attitudes toward losing.  Rafa is terrified of losing which has driven his work ethic and his competitive spirit for his whole life.  Pete is not afraid to lose, encouraged from a young age to focus on improving his own skills rather than dwelling on match-to-match results.  One wonders where Roger falls on that spectrum.  My guess is closer to Rafa's end.

Like Rafa, this is a fun book though probably most fun for a tennis fan - probably not so much to offer for someone who doesn't follow the sport.  Agassi's Open is a better book for those with more casual interest.

Please join us and share your own review of your best read from the past month.  This month's link list is below.  I'll keep it open until the end of the day.  I'll post April's tomorrow.  Meetings are the last Friday of each month.  Next gathering is April 25th.



24 comments:

  1. Sports biographies are so fun! I grew up watching the Sampras-Agassi rivalry in action so I, too, would likely find this appealing for the reminiscence-factor alone. I also admired Sampras' quiet approach to the sport. He alsoways seemed to exude a steady confidence--and his outbursts on the court seemed so few, a real measure of patience and sportsmanship.
    Thanks for your insights!
    Veronica :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He took great pride in his steady on-court persona, too - felt it was an important part of his competitive edge. If you let the other guy see you lose your cool, he'll sense weakness and pounce.

      Delete
  2. Sounds interesting, but not really my kind of book.
    However, want to say a big THANK YOU for creating this monthly gathering and CONGRATS on turning one year old next month! ALways fun to see what other people recommend!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Katie! I'm so glad you've become a regular participant, too.

      Delete
  3. Hopefully I've linked up correctly although it's not showing yet. Pete Sampras always seemed to be rather shy so reading his book might be quite interesting. I am a tennis fan (from the sofa) and remember watching Pete win Wimbledon several years running.

    Congratulations on reaching the year milestone!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your link is good!

      I'm a couch fan, too. Never really played much at all - just enough to appreciate how difficult it is.

      Delete
  4. I don't read a lot of non-fiction but this one has my attention. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think non-fiction's gotten a lot better over the years, actually. A lot of talented writers seem to be drawn to it these days.

      Delete
  5. I don't follow tennis at all but your review was thorough and nicely written. How exciting that we're coming up on our first anniversary! The Paper Anniversary, how appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Stephanie. I'm so grateful to all of you who've taken the Coffeehouse on as a part of your regular blogging schedules. It's a wonderful community we're building together.

      Delete
  6. I haven't been a fan of tennis ever since I was a teen, when my now-hubby tried to impress me by jumping over the net, and ended up crumbled on the ground, clutching his, um, as yet untapped font of our future children...

    Seriously, I used to enjoy playing, but was never much for watching the sport. Unless you count that hyped-up match between Billie Jean King and Bobby... crud, I can't even remember his name now.

    Still, great review. I'm most intrigued by the idea of two different players with such different personalities writing about the other players. The truth probably lies somewhere between their two accounts.

    Congrats on making it to a year. A monthly "book club" was a terrific idea, and I'm glad it's succeeded so well. And thanks for inviting me!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great story about your husband - poor guy!

      Bobby Riggs. That match is one of the best sports stories ever.

      So glad you're a part of our gatherings, Susan!

      Delete
  7. I like book recommendations when the reviewer is knowledgeable on the topic. That's why this is a good review. I especially like your discussion of "losing" and what it means to different athletes. That's something we can all apply to our own endeavors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find Sampras's attitude toward losing to be fascinating - completely goes against the conventional wisdom regarding elite athletes. Nadal fits the expected mold.

      Delete
  8. My mum and her bff, esp. the bff, looooved Pete Sampras - but I always used to say he was really hairy. :P Yep, that's what some non-tennis-playing women talk about while watching tennis. ;)

    I really think from having seen him in interviews, public appearances, etc., he sounds like he's a pretty down to earth, humble guy, despite that arrogance you mentioned which most grand slam tennis players probably can't help. ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I know. That's what my wife does when she watches with me. She likes Nadal. Who wouldn't?

      Delete
  9. I think it would take a lot of convincing to get me to read a book about tennis.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't watch tennis, much less read about it. It's interesting that you've read so many tennis biographies, though. I suppose it allows you to view an entire era of tennis from all sides.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. It's fascinating to have insight into what players think of each other - as people and as athletic rivals.

      Delete
  11. Ah! I missed the sign up for March! Apologies for my scatty attendance.
    I wouldn't have picked a tennis book but biographies interest me enormously. Especially of inspirational sorts. Happy surprise with the attitude to losing! So now if I see this book on the library shelf I would be likely to read it.
    Happy Coffeehouse Birthday- going to make this an excuse to eat coffee cake :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Always delighted to have you join us when you can. I'm also pleased to provide an excuse to eat coffee cake.

      Delete
  12. Sorry it took me so long to get around to commenting! It's been a busy week!

    I always liked Sampras. Don't ask me why...but I think it had a lot to do with his demeanor on the tennis court. Agassi was the flashy player of the time, with his beautiful locks of bleached hair. All the girls swooned and loved his fast nature. But, Sampras acted like tennis was all business and got the job done on the court when he needed to. Sounds like I would enjoy Sampras's book more than Agassi's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad to hear from you, Mary!

      For the on court demeanor, Federer is certainly his heir. Fed's game is prettier, though.

      Delete